It’s my asthma

An interesting case from the Pediatric ED:

A mid teen female with a reported two year history of mild persistent asthma, presented with asthma exacerbation. She presented to an outside ED with two days of cough, wheezing and shortness of air which acutely worsened three hours prior to arrival. Upon initial presentation there, the patient was reported to be in moderate respiratory distress with increased work of  breathing, tachypnea, and an O2 saturation in the 80%’s on room air. Lung auscultation revealed diminished breath sounds on the left with faint wheezing at left and right apices. She was placed on 3L nasal cannula with normalization of her O2 sats. She received an hour long course of albuterol and dose of Solu-Medrol, with moderate improvement in her symptoms. She subsequently received a chest X-ray which was concerning for a large left sided bleb/cyst with mediastinal shift to the right. Patient was subsequently transferred to us.

Further HPI and PMHx revealed that patient was diagnosed with allergic rhinitis in her early teens and diagnosed with asthma two years ago. She reported no history of ever being evaluated with a chest x-ray prior to current presentation. Over the course of the past two years she had been prescribed 3 courses of steroids and used albuterol approximately 2x per week PRN. Patient denied any other medical problems or smoking history.

A CT scan of the chest confirmed presence of large left sided pulmonary cyst.

Patient was admitted and followed by both pediatric pulmonology and surgery. Inpatient workup included PFT’s and alpha-1-anti-trypsin (negative). She was eventually diagnosed with idiopathic giant bullous emphysema, otherwise known as vanishing lung syndrome. She later underwent bullectomy with improvement of her symptoms.

Bullous emphysema is often seen as a complication of COPD in adults, but rarely diagnosed in children with few case reports in the literature. Giant bullae can present asymptomatically, with progressive dyspnea, hypoxia or hemoptysis. Giant bullous emphysema is classified as occupying more than one third of a hemi-thorax, and is often initially mistaken as a pneumothorax on initial chest radiograph. As disease progresses, enlargement of the bullae fill with air and loss of lung function results as fibrous membranous surface of the bullae result in poor gas exchange. Bullae are at high risk for rupture and tension pneumothorax should be suspected if a patient develops worsening respiratory distress.

The learning point I took from this case is to step back and re-evaluate a patient’s presentation when things do not exactly add up, as in this case a teen with worsening asthma not responding to conventional treatment and little pcp workup in the past. This point is particularly exemplified in the pediatric population where we often see several low acuity cases each shift, often drifting into “auto pilot” mode, employing little critical thinking. Don’t forget, rare or more complex pathology may actually be responsible for the patients symptoms.

Don’t Inhale

Had an interesting case recently while I was working at Jewish Downtown. Approximately 50s male presents in acute respiratory distress. Apparently he rented out some apartments and one of the tenants clogged one of the toilets, I didn’t have a chance to ask how.

Anyway, in an attempt to fix the problem he mixed two plumbing agents: Liquid Fire Drain Opener & some other generic drain-o liquid that he planned to use to clear the pipes. This ended up being a bad idea and a chemical reaction occurred releasing a cloud of chlorine gas. The patient inhaled this and began becoming progressively more short of breath.

While en route, EMS initially had him on a nasal cannula but transitioned him to a non-rebreather as well as a Duo-neb. At the time of his arrival to room 1 the patient was in obvious respiratory distress, diaphoretic, and anxious pulling at the non-rebreather and leads. His O2 sat was from 86%-88% on the non-rebreather with decreased breath sounds diffusely. We elected to intubate the patient with etomidate as our induction agent and rocuronium as our paralytic. After the patient was placed on the ventilator we started the patient on nebulized sodium bicarbonate.

This was something I had never done before – so I wanted to discuss chlorine gas inhalational injuries and the role of nebulized bicarb.

Chlorine gas inhalations typically occur in the setting of chemicals for cleaning an indoor pool. Chlorine gas inhalation rarely progresses to respiratory distress requiring intubation.

In 1994 the Journal of Clinical Toxicology did a two year retrospective review of 86 cases of chlorine gas inhalation and none of the patients progressed to respiratory insufficiency requiring ventilator support.  The most common symptoms are cough, chest pain, and shortness of breath and the chest xray is often unrevealing. In the study all 86 cases received nebulized sodium bicarbonate and none of the patients clinically deteriorated or acutely worsened as a result of the treatment.

While the nebulized bicarb does not reverse or work to eliminate the inhaled chlorine, it helps symptomatically with the cough and SOA. I could not find much information on the MOA or science behind the use of nebulized sodium bicarbonate but it appears to be pretty safe.

The dosing that I found is 4mL of 4% nebulized NaHCO3, and be prepared to explain this to the respiratory therapist because this is not something that they do often. Also this has to come up from pharmacy as code cart sodium bicarb is typically 7.5% so the concentrations are different.

So our patient received his nebulized bicarb once it came up from pharmacy. He was admitted to the ICU and I have not had a chance to follow up on his outcome yet. I just thought this was an interesting case and something that I had not yet encountered and figured I would share for your reading pleasures.

Abandon the BVM?

Excellent 1 pager from Dr Levitan in the new ACEP now newspaper.

I have been trying to get the residents to implement the nasal cannula, and to a lesser extent the LMA, for years. Pearl: nasal cannula plus mandible traction opens the nasopharynx and allows oxygen to diffuse to the alveoli (due to gradient made by hemoglobin absorbing oxygen). This is apnea oxygenation, increased safe apnea time. See the pure gold article by Levitan/Weingart, apparently 4th most read annals of EM article.

Add the cannula and mandible thrust to a properly positioned patient, ear to sternal notch or even well above sternal notch, and you will be amazed how long it takes to desat. OOPS (Oxygen On, Pull the mandible, Sit the patient up.

Read this brief article a few times and change how you practice.

Just say NO to DESAT

I was about to spend a lot of time on a post here about pre oxygenation, specifically re: apnea oxygenation with nasal cannula. I was inspired be yet another favorable article in this month’s Academic EM (which by the way is going to be online ONLY as of Jan 2017).

Then realized Weingart had of course already posted a ridiculously good synopsis of what was out at the time.

If you plan at anytime in the future to intubate a human patient, STOP what you are doing and read the Emcrit post before your next intubation.

Add to his post the new article. And the common sense that a nasal cannula has no risk to the patient. There is just no reason not to place a 10L or greater nasal cannula on all patients during intubation.

Just finished writing the post and noticed EMLitofNote just reviewed this article, also linked to a LITFL post and a Rebel EM post. Their conclusions are similar, though they call for an RCT. Not sure we need to spend a bunch of money on an RCT. I say just use the cannula for 5 minutes while you intubate.

A Mysterious Death in a 21 yo Healthy White Female, and the Larson Maneuver

My wife is at work at a hand surgery pre-op care clinic. It is her birthday. In walks a middle-aged male who is about to have tendon reconstruction after he sustained a crush trauma, and is excited about the possibility of returning to work. He is slightly abrasive and somber, despite the prospect of receiving the surgery.

My wife asks him if he is concerned about the procedure, asks if he is feeling well, asks if there is anything she can do to help. With a quiet manner he states all is well. To make discussion my wife states today is her birthday and she is excited to celebrate when she gets home. He smiles and states today is also his daughter’s birthday. She was born the same year as my wife. He states today is always a rough day for him because she passed away in an emergency room 7 years ago at 21 years of age.

We can never fully understand where those we treat are coming from, their life experiences, or what their home situations, thoughts, fears, dreams, and worries entail; and this was a reminder for me. He stated that his daughter was healthy,woke up without issue on that day, but later developed difficulty breathing and wheezing. She was diagnosed with an acute asthma attack. She had one episode in the distant past but was not on any routine medications. She was given albuterol and experienced a negative reaction to the albuterol and completely stopped breathing. She was brain dead by the time she was intubated. They withdrew care in the emergency department.

After my wife shared this with me, I searched to find any case reports of paradoxical reactions to albuterol. Below are three related cases, however bronchospasm becoming worse with beta-blockers is exceptionally rare.

Case reports of paradoxical bronchospasm to inhaled beta agonists:

What I think more probable, and possibly related to the above case reports, is acute laryngospasm. The albuterol she received may have further irritated her vocal cords potentially worsening, rather than relieving her vocal cord dysfunction. Both Resus.me and LITFL (Life In The Fast Lane) have very useful articles describing management (see below for links). Here is a brief synopsis:

Laryngospasm

What is it?: a potentially life-threatening closure of the vocal chords (can occur spontaneously). Often misdiagnosed as asthma—especially exercise-induced asthma (more common in white females).

How to diagnose (and differentiate from asthma):

  • Stridorous sounds are usually loudest over the anterior neck, beware wheezing sounds transmit throughout the lungs
  • Typically, albuterol has minimal to no beneficial effect.
  • Subjectively more difficulty on inspiration than expiration

   Clues in history: recent exercise, GERD, ENT procedures, or extubation

   Common causes & some that are not-so common:

  • Post extubation
  • Exercise
  • GERD
  • Medications (e.g., (1) ketamine sedation, incidence 1-2 %; (2) versed (very rarely), which can be reversed with flumazenil)
  • Near drowning/ aspiration
  • Inhalants (smoke, ammonia, dust, cleaning chemicals)
  • Related to anxiety
  • Strychnine (plant based poison, sometimes used as a pesticide for birds and rodents, also the poison reportedly used to kill Alexander the Great in 323 BC)

Treatment of laryngospasm:

Initially:

  1. Jaw thrust with Larson Maneuver
  2. CPAP/ NIPPV
  3. Heliox might be helpful if available, (also topical lidocaine can be applied to larynx if available)

If conservative measures fail:

  1. Low dose propofol (0.1 mg/kg) ~ give 10 mg
  2. Low dose succinylcholine (AKA: suxamethonium) 0.1-0.5 mg/kg IV
  3. All else fails: intubation with succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg IV
    • If no IV access, then succinylcholine IM (3-4 mg/kg). Experts advocate IM injection into the tongue.
    • Perform chest thrust maneuver immediately preceding intubation to open the vocal cords and allow passage of the ET tube.
    • Monitor for negative pressure pulmonary edema—(from patient pulling hard against closed glottis in the setting of acute asphyxia).

Flow chart from Resus.me

Larygospasm_flow_high_res

What is the Larson Maneuver? (Published 1998 in Anesthesiology)

It is a manipulation jaw thrust technique targeted at the ‘Larson’s point‘, AKA: laryngospasm notch.

  • Place middle finger of each hand in the laryngospasm notch, located behind the lobule of each ear, between ascending ramus of the mandible and the mastoid process.
  • Press very firmly inward toward the base of the skull with both fingers
  • At the same time lift the mandible at a right angle to the plane of the body (perform jaw thrust).

Reportedly will convert laryngospasm within one or two breath cycles to laryngeal stridor, and in after a couple more breath cycles, to unobstructed respirations. As proposed by Larson, it is likely that the painful stimulus relaxes the vocal cords by way of either the parasympathetic or sympathetic nervous systems through the glossopharyngeal nerve.

Diagram from LITFL

Larson_man

References:

  1. Resus.Me: http://resus.me/laryngospasm-after-ketamine/
  2. LITFL (Life In The Fast Lane): http://lifeinthefastlane.com/ccc/laryngospasm/
  3. UpToDate: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/paradoxical-vocal-fold-motion?source=machineLearning&search=Laryngospasm&selectedTitle=1~150&sectionRank=1&anchor=H3#H3
  4. Larson, Philip, MD. Laryngospasm-The Best Treatment. Anesthesiology. 1998. http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1947036
  5. Paradoxical bronchospasm: a potentially life threatening adverse effect of albuterol. South Med J. 2006 Mar;99(3):288-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16553105
  6. Paradoxical response to levalbuterol. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 Apr;108(4):211-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18443029
  7. Paradoxical reaction to salbutamol in an asthma patient. Pneumologia. 2012. Jul-Sep;61(3):171-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23173379

Sick PEs

We had a very ill patient recently. She was found down upstairs visiting her family member. She was calmly altered, not agitated but was in mild distress. Consciousness fluctuated. Tachycardic and hypertensive initially, then had more labile BP and some hypotension.

We had to intubate her due to poor MS and clinical condition. She coded in CT, we placed a central line on the CT table between her noncontrast head CT and her CT chest. We pushed an amp of Epi and ran out of the room for the CT chest. We were worried about dissection and PE in equal amounts. We could not get good cardiac windows on bedside Echo in room 9 prior to the CT.

She continued to intermittently lose her pulse and drop her BP. We confirmed bilat PEs on the CT when we saw NO contrast left her right ventricle. The CT tech noticed first and became worried the patient had no cardiac output (ie pulseless).

We rushed the patient back to room 9 and gave a tPA bolus (50mg) followed by infusion of 40mg. She was on pressors and heparin and improving. Dr Smith accepted her to Jewish for possible EKOS or even ECMO if needed. On arrival to Jewish a few hours later she coded and died.

I was surprised when I found out she had died. Her O2 sat was improving, HR was decreasing, blood pressure was stable (though dependent on pressors). She received a large amount of crystalloid IV which according to some data might not have been optimal management. She also had the following ECG:

FullSizeRender

I think she was infarcting her myocardium. She likely had pulmonary infarction considering her poor oxygenation. She had coded a few times. She had a lot of strikes against her. Her BEST SHOT was going to a place with catheter assisted treatment for PE and ECMO if needed.

I am posting the case to let everyone know:

  1. How to manage sick PE patients (see post below)
  2. To use tPA in massive and in many cases of submassive PE
  3. TRANSFER sick PE patients to Jewish for EKOS/ECMO
  4. The decision to diagnose PE with RV strain on BEDSIDE Echo with no formal Radiologic testing will depend on your attending

This post from EmCrit / PulmCrit is a beautiful summary with potential dogmalysis related to PE management (see take home points below but do read the post).

In addition, here is a nice review article on catheter-based reperfusion treatment for PE with nice references for further reading.

Take home points from the Emcrit post:

  • The only evidence-based intervention that seems to improve mortality in massive PE is thrombolysis.   The primary goal of therapy should be administration of thrombolysis as soon as possible to patients without contraindication.
  • Consider early stabilization of blood pressure using a norepinephrine infusion, administered peripherally if necessary.
  • Volume administration may facilitate dilation of the right ventricle and hemodynamic deterioration.
  • Intubation is very hazardous and should be avoided if possible.   Patients die from cardiovascular collapse, and intubation may worsen this.
  • For a coding PE patient consider 50mg alteplase bolus as well as an infusion of epinephrine.  Patients can do well despite requiring CPR and high dose vasopressor infusions.

Approach to PE

Hey all,
I got the privilege of going to ACEP last week in Boston. When I got the schedule one of the lectures that stood out to be was a PE lecture by Jeffrey Kline. Some of you may recognize the name but if not, he is an attending at IU with a special interest in thromboembolism. He is very active on twitter at @klinelab and wrote the Thromboembolism chapter in Tintinalli’s. After talking about PE last month and specifically approach to PE in the pregnant patient, I thought a summary of the key points would make for a worthwhile post.

The first question in the discussion of VTE should be ‘who actually needs to be tested?’ If someone comes in complaining of recent chest pain or dyspnea, PE needs to be included in the differential. If they are not complaining of those recently and have normal vitals (at all times) then you don’t need to go chasing down a clot that isn’t there. If the patient does complain of those then some sort of documentation is required to show you considered a PE. Even stating ‘I think PE is unlikely because of X, Y and Z’ would likely be enough. Now if your pretest probability is anything other than very low, some combination of wells, perc, Geneva should be applied. I like the following algorithm which I think Kline discussed on EMRap towards the end of last year.
algo

Following that algorithm helps cut down on the number of ct scans you’ll order, cuts down your false-positives, radiation exposure, and contrast induced nephropathy without increasing the number of significant PE’s that you miss.

As far as the pregnant patient, I think everyone knows to start with the lower extremity ultrasounds in hopes of an answer that would let you initiate treatment. However, when that is inevitably negative, there is also an algorithm for that scenario that incorporates a trimester adjusted d dimer.

algopreg

The other main takeaway from this talk was the disposition change on some of the low risk patients. Dr. Kline said he has sent about 70 patients home from the ED after being diagnosed with PE. To stratify who falls into low risk, you can apply the sPESI or HESTIA score as well as who is at low risk of bleeding.

–Simplified PESI-if any +, pt is NOT low risk:
age greater than 80
history of cancer
history of chronic cardiopulmonary disease
pulse greater than 100
BP less than 100
O2 sat less than 90

–Hestia-pt CAN BE considered low risk if
BP greater than 100
No thrombolysis needed
No active bleeding
02 sats greater than 90
Not already anticoagulated
No other medical or social reason for admission
Cr clearance greater than 30
not pregnant, no severe liver disease

For these people they’ll initiate rivaroxaban or apixaban in the ED and send them home with a prescription. The only failures they’ve experienced are people who returned requiring additional pain management. Has anyone done this or considered it? The majority of our patient population would not satisfy these requirements or, frankly, be reliable enough to consider outpatient management, but what about people working in the community with a different population?

Lastly, we all know to look for S1Q3T3 on the ekg to raise suspicion for PE but the odds ratio is only 2.06. Inverted T’s in V2 and V3 have odds ratios of 6.94 and 7.07 respectively, and are the most SPECIFIC ekg finding in pulmonary embolism

Better to be lucky than good

I was called to a code in the ICU.  I roll into the room, 38yo IVDA hx, admitted for sepsis, septic emboli, and ARDS.   Stable vital signs 10 minutes previously, now in PEA arrest.  Already tubed and had a triple lumen in the IJ.   Not a whole lot for me to add for immediate stabilization with a secure airway and access.   Already had epi x1.  Accucheck was 149 (never, never forget this in a code).

So I immediately get to go to the second phase and start thinking reversible causes.  With that hx, all sorts of interesting diagnoses on the playing field.  The one major thing I notice was the patient was extremely cyanotic from the upper chest on up.   CBC and BMP from a few hours ago essentially unremarkable aside from a white count of 26.  Coags normal.  Actually starting to kick around the idea of empirically thrombolyzing this dude.  All of a sudden, quick run of v-fib, zap him with 200 and voila! we have a pulse.  I order a new rainbow of labs, cxr, call his pulmonologist to recite my efforts,  and strut back down stairs with a little gangster lean feeling pretty good.

I sit down, take a deep breath, and head to see the next patient.  And BOOM!  Code alarm goes off once again.  Head back into the room, next verse same as the first.  Guy suddenly went PEA arrest again, CPR was already in progress.  No labs back.  I have them pull up the CXR.

IMG_3103

Well sh*t, I swear I listened to him during the first code.  Bilateral breath sounds (course, but there).   I listen again, knowing there is a big pneumo, still can hear.  Obvious tracheal deviation on the CXR, but time to get moving.   So I ask for an angiocath and a chest tube set up.  Deer in headlights, no one moves.  Someone finally scurries off to find a pleurovac and tube.

Still waiting for an angiocath, they hand me something that looks like something I’d LP a 10 day old with, not gonna cut it.  Finally they roll in with this kit that looked like they pulled off a dusty shelf.  Has what looks like a 8 inch spinal needle with a pigail catheter already attached to it.  That’s it.  nothing else in the kit besides and adaptor to attach to the pleuravac.  Don’t have a lot of time to search for anything else so I went with it.  Was actually really slick- put the needle into the chest cavity, pulled out the inner cannula, heard the hiss and fed the pigtail.  That’s it, working chest tube in place in about the same time it would take to do a needle decompression.

IMG_3105

Immediate return of pulse and stable blood pressure.   Thank god.  That would have been a totally reversible cause of death in a young patient.  If I hadn’t ordered or remembered to check that x-ray, would have been on my shoulders.

I post this for a couple of reasons.

#1 Don’t get too cute in your codes.  Start with the basics and build from there.  I was too busy thinking about lytics etc, and had an easily reversible cause right in front of me.  Don’t forget your DOPES mnemonic for ventilated patients.

D- dislodgement, check your tubes, end tidal or even preferably direct visualization.  Especially in a patient getting CPR.

O- obstruction, always suction, mucous plugging is an easy removal.

P- Pneumo, already talked this through.

E- Equipment, I recommend always pulling your codes off the vent and bagging through the ET tube to take this one off the radar.

S- stacked breaths.  Too much PEEP or high respiratory rates without adequate expiration time can cause air trapping and decreased venous return.  Once you pull someone off the vent and bag.  Take a second and manually press the chest wall down.  Can fix the problem immediately and you look like a total ninja if it works.

Just get a walking O2 sat

In patients with some suspicion for PE, even with a negative d dimer, I have often ordered a walking O2 sat and HR. This was not really evidence based, but maybe now could be. Below is the abstract for a prospective cohort study of patients known to be with and without PE. Interesting data even if only 114 patients. Cannot get full text yet.

Take home point. Combined sensitivity of HR increase of 10 BPM AND Sat decreased of >/= 2% was 100%.

ie if HR does not go up by 10 or more AND sat does not drop by 2 or more they are very unlikely, based on this small study, to have a PE.

 

 

CJEM. 2015 May;17(3):270-8. doi: 10.1017/cem.2014.45.

Ambulatory vital signs in the workup of pulmonary embolism using a standardized 3-minute walk test.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism can be difficult given its highly variable clinical presentation. Our objective was to determine whether a decrease in oxygen saturation or an increase in heart rate while ambulating could be used as an objective tool in the diagnosis of pulmonaryembolism.

METHODS:

This was a two-site tertiary-care-centre prospective cohort study that enrolled adult emergency department or thrombosis clinic patients with suspected or newly confirmed pulmonary embolism. Patients were asked to participate in a standardized 3-minute walk test, which assessedambulatory heart rate and ambulatory oxygen saturation. The primary outcome was pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS:

We enrolled 114 patients, including 30 with pulmonary embolism (26.3%). A ≥2% absolute decrease in ambulatory oxygen saturation and an ambulatory change in heart rate >10 beats per minute (BPM) were significantly associated with pulmonary embolism. An ambulatory heart rate change of >10 BPM had a sensitivity of 96.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.3 to 99.4) and a specificity of 31.0% (95% CI 22.1 to 45.0) forpulmonary embolism. A ≥2% absolute decrease ambulatory oxygen saturation had a sensitivity of 80.2% (95% CI 62.7 to 90.5) and a specificity of 39.3% (95% CI 29.5 to 50.0) for pulmonary embolism. The combination of both variables yielded a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI 87.0 to 100.0) and a specificity of 11.0% (95% CI 6.6 to 21.0).

CONCLUSION:

In summary, our study found that an ambulatory heart rate change of >10 BPM or a ≥2% absolute decrease in ambulatory oxygen saturation from baseline during a standardized 3-minute walk test are highly correlated with pulmonary embolism. Although the findings appear promising, neither of these variables can currently be recommended as a screening tool for pulmonary embolism until larger prospective studies examine their performance either alone or with pre-existing rules.

The elusive S1Q3T3

So this is a case I thought was interesting that I had in the department back in May. We all know that the most common EKG finding in the setting of PE is sinus tach, however the pimp question that is also asked is the finding of S1Q3T3. While I can easily recite the alphabetic-numeric code S1Q3T3 by heart at the drop of a hat, I had never seen one and honestly thought I never would. I thought finding S1Q3T3 was likely as rare as surviving a ED thoracotomy (OK maybe not that rare).  So on to the case.

39 year old female presents to the ED complaining of SOA and cough for the past two weeks. Cough was productive of green sputum, no fevers, and she does complain of some chest pain which sounds pleuritic in nature. Initial vitals HR 118 BP 111/73 RR 16 O2 97% room air. As I get into her PMH she says she has a history of multiple PEs with an IVC filter placed 1 yr ago because apparently she wasn’t very good at remembering to take her coumadin. She has had a hypercoagulability workup which was negative, no recent travel, no estrogen use.

So at this point with a history of multiple PEs, tachycardia, SOA, and pleuritic chest pain I am thinking I am going to scan this lady. Even though she had a IVC placed a year ago, she is still saying all the right things for PE. So while the CTPE protocol was cooking I got an EKG and there it was, S1Q3T3!

S1Q3T3

Needless to say I was pretty excited and immediately showed the rotating intern next to me who clearly didn’t share my enthusiasm. When I compared this new EKG to a past EKG a month ago she did not have the S1Q3T3.During her admission a month ago, when she had a normal EKG, she had a CTPE showing a chronic PE. This time when her CTPE came back the read was Acute on Chronic Pulmonary Embolism. So a month ago she had a chronic PE with a normal EKG and at this visit she had an EKG with S1Q3T3 and a acute on chronic PE. Out of curiosity I dug through her medical history a little bit more and found that this patient had multiple prior admissions for PE with multiple CTPE protocols and EKGs. What I found was that whenever this patient had a CT read of Chronic PE she had a normal sinus rhythm EKG. However, whenever she had a read of Acute on Chronic PE (which was 4 times!) she had a EKG showing S1Q3T3, dating all the way back to 2012. Yea, apparently this lady has been hanging out with a chronic PE in her distal right main pulmonary artery since 2012 and every once in a while she will throw a new small PE, even with an IVC filter.

So after doing a little bit of thinking and a little bit of reading it made sense. The EKG finding of S1Q3T3 is indicative of right heart strain, in this case resulting from an acute PE. So this patient’s heart has adapted to her chronic PE, however every time she throws a new PE she has an element of right heart strain which can be seen on her EKG as S1Q3T3.

I just thought this was pretty interesting to actually see the physiologic and mechanical adaption and strain this patient’s heart was undergoing being clearly demonstrated on her EKG. Also I learned that S1Q3T3 is not like a q wave after an MI in that it stays on the patient’s EKG, it is a finding that comes and goes depending on the patient’s presentation.

Anyways I thought this was a pretty cool little case and figured I would share. Hope you all enjoyed.

Ready for discharge?

Interesting case from my MICU month.  Pt is a middle aged  WM with hx of HIV, CVA presented to the ED with hypoxic respiratory failure and sepsis. Intubated in the ED and admitted to the unit. Pt self extubated few hours later in the MICU. Responded well to fluids, antibiotics and O2 nasal cannula.  Few days later, nurse d/c’ed his RIJ central line.

Within minutes,  pt became severely altered, O2 sats plummeted to the 60s and  bedside ultrasound showed significant air bubbles in the cardiac chambers.

What happened? When central line was removed, the wound site was not immediately occluded (with fingers, dressing with tape, etc). As pt inhaled, air traveled through the communicating conduit into the central blood vessel.

What to do now? Intubate for severe respiratory distress. Place pt in left lateral decubitus position and Trendelenburg position–prevents air from traveling to the pulmonary arteries causing airflow obstruction. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, if you suspect cerebral embolism, as it decreases mortality.

The pt was intubated, placed on his side with bed tilted down. Did fine and transferred to floor the next day.

Positioning is Everything

When using a chest x-ray to look for a pneumothorax, positioning of the patient is everything.  The first chest x-ray below is an upright chest x-ray from an OSH of a patient that fell 30 feet from deer stand and was found to have a right pneumothorax.  The OSH didn’t do any other imaging and didn’t even send the patient with a c-collar.

When the patient arrived we laid him down and placed a c-collar and assumed that his spines weren’t cleared yet.  When we shot the portable, supine chest x-ray in our ED we couldn’t see a pneumothorax and our radiologist actually read it as no pneumothorax.

Using the US, an EFAST was performed and showed a pneumothorax and the subsequent Chest CT verified it.  Therefore the next time you get an ED, supine chest xray on someone, remember that just because you don’t see a pneumothorax on a supine CXR, doesn’t mean they don’t have one.  The optimal xray is an upright chest xray (expiratory if possible)!

Upright OSH xrayUpright Chest x-ray from OSH

Supine UofL portable Xray

Portable, supine Chest X-ray in our ED

CT scan

CT showing the Right Pneumothorax

DSI

DSI works. Weingart’s original article was descriptive. Now he follows with a prospective observational study. I actually haven’t read the whole article yet because like a good book, I just don’t want it to be over. Everyone needs to read this.

Also we all need to quit being slackers on room9er. Lets try to get a few more posts in before the holidays hit us.

Utility of a CXR

Hey Guys,
Thought I’d post this as I feel it was a mistake on my part, though fortunately no harm came from it.

50 year old guy this past Saturday (which was a ridiculous shift full of drunks and unhelmeted mopeds and motorcyclists with some very sick people) who was an unhelmeted moped rider going reportedly 60mph and wrecked while drinking alcohol and somehow managed not to make their way to Rm 9.
BP: 125/73. HR: 86. RR: 18. O2 saturation: 91% on room air. Temp: 97.6 F (oral)
A&Ox3, c/o shortness of breath and diffuse chest tenderness. Not really any obvious bad looking signs of trauma and had been log-rolled prior to my eval (triaged about 1hr 45min before I saw him).

I saw him, in no respiratory distress, maybe some expiratory wheezing on my exam, but with breath sounds on both sides and no crepitus that I could feel to his anterior chest. I finish my eval and just order a MAN scan based on his Hx and due to his drinking alcohol (EtOh 292)
Patient is taken to CT at 23:05 (about 2 hrs after I ordered them) and the nurse grabs me after the scan and tells me I need to look at his chest CT (only his C-spine images were up at the time which showed me all kinds of SubQ emphysema).

Chest CT Pneumo

Just a lesson learned; when it’s super busy like that shift was is when we need to be the most cautious and really think critically about the things we need to do, and not be in a hurry when we’re putting orders in.
The guy is doing well so far (and not intubated) and in THIS case no harm was done, I put a chest tube in without difficulty. But I really should have gotten a CXR to start.
His injuries included Bilateral 1st-6th Rib Fx’s, Pulmonary Contusions, Mediastinal Hematoma, Manubrium Fx, C7 Fx, T4, T7 Fx.